Just
the
opposite characterizes the man who would kill rail. Mayoral candidate
Ben Cayetano announced his race 95 days ago on January 19, and he still
hasn’t
provided a detailed look at his bus rapid transit (BRT) scheme he says
he’d
implement instead of rail.
One man is
transparent, the other opaque. Take your pick, Oahu.
Mr.Cayetano told Civil Beat in an email (date uncertain, but no later than March
21) that “he would share the full transit plan by mid-April,” quoting Civil
Beat’s March 21 post.
Even if you
widen the mid-month definition by a week on either side of April 15, the month's midpoint,
April 23 falls in late April, so where’s Mr. Cayetano’s plan?
Transparency
If you
haven’t visited HART’s website, now’s a good time to see what
transparency looks like. Want to know how and why Mr. Grabauskas was selected
to run HART? The website has reports by Krauthamer & Associates Inc. and by
HART’s Human Resources Committee on his recruitment. Just click on Library,
then on General Information.
You’re more
interested in the project’s work with the Hawaiian community and Traditional
Cultural Properties concerns? Clicking on the Planning tab reveals a drop-down
menu with the link.
Pick a
rail-related topic and you can find it at the website – station design,
environmental impact statements, HART board meetings, interactive route maps
and so on – even why elevated rail was selected instead of adding more buses.
Opaqueness
That last
point leads us back to Mr. Cayetano, who wants to kill mobility-enhancing,
travel time-shortening, development-guiding, transportation-equity ensuring and
job-creating Honolulu rail without revealing details about his big idea – to
increase the number of buses on our streets and highways by implementing the
Harris Administration's BRT plan circa 2000.
That plan
failed, by the way – run out of town for its obvious defects, such as
dedicating a car lane on Ala Moana Boulevard to the exclusive use of buses. If
you weren’t around a dozen years ago, you can nevertheless imagine the howls of
protest – from average citizens and City Council members alike.
Cliff
Slater, who supplies anti-rail talking points to Mr. Cayetano, called the BRT plan a “farce.” He referred primarily to in-town BRT, which documentation
showed would save only a minute or two in travel time compared to car travel,
but we gladly apply that term to Mr. Cayetano’s new-old-yet-still-undisclosed BRT plan,
even without the details.
Adding more
buses to already congested surface roads and highways and suggesting that would
be an appropriate response to congestion would be farcical, ludicrous, absurd –
take your pick. Elevated Honolulu
rail will avoid that congestion; BRT would add to it.
Silent
Treatment
Equally
absurd is the notion that a candidate can run for mayor on a one-plank platform
to kill rail without telling voters anything about his alternative. We even created a NEW RULE to cover this absurdity:
Candidates
who propose killing large municipal projects that have been planned and vetted
for years must disclose an alternative plan’s details within 90 days of
launching their campaigns.
Mr.
Cayetano’s 90 days expired on April 18, and so has any shred of integrity in his
anti-rail campaign.
The
incredibly
patient Honolulu news media live up to their laid-back
reputation by not pressing the candidate for a full exposition of his
BRT plan, which reasonably should have been available on Day 1.
2 comments:
born in hawaii....."stop" the system now. It is not for hawaii people and u know it. its for the military and tourist.only ahout 5 percent of hawaii people will benefit. when the h-1 was built it caused so much traffic jambs for a long time and no one planned for the future. salt lake has the largest number of working people.the whole project cost to much for our pocket books. been around for 76 years. u can't fool an old bird. someone is involved in MONEY.
Thanks for visting, Anonymous, but no -- I don't know what you suggest. Rail isn't being built for tourists or the military; it's for Oahu residents who now contend with some of the worst highway congestion in the country.
Ironic that you should bring up the H-1. There were opponents to building that highway more than 50 years ago, and where would we be without it today? You don't contend the traffic jams weren't worth it, do you?
Scroll down in the right-hand column of this blog until you reach the red print. Click on the "aggregation site" link, then read the links below the Project Goals heading. They describe why this project is needed and why it's now being built.
Post a Comment