This June 1 Sound Transit crash created plenty of "dew-dew."
You could be in for a
surprise if you think this year’s mayoral race is a contest between only two
forms of public transportation – elevated rail vs. bus rapid transit.
Almost unnoticed in media
coverage was candidate Ben Cayetano’s “and/or” statement a week ago that hinted
at-grade rail transit could be part of his plan if he’s elected and scraps the
current rail project.
As we noted in yesterday’spost, Mr. Cayetano’s commentary at HawaiiReporter.com on June 8 included this
commitment near its top: “I will explore what many cities throughout the US
have turned to: bus rapid transit and/or at-grade light rail (emphasis added).”
It appears the so-called
mainstream media didn’t pick up on that nuance, but one of Mr. Cayetano’s
opponents in the race to lead Honolulu did. Former managing director
Kirk Caldwell’s list of questions he’s directed at Mr. Cayetano included this
among its dozens of bullet points:
“Candidate Cayetano recently
has added ‘at-grade’ light rail systems as part of his plan for Honolulu. Where
does he plan to use light rail? How does he plan to fund it? How will trans
intersect and therefore interfere with street traffic?”
Many more questions must be
asked and answered about Mr. Cayetano’s apparent intention to use light-rail
transit as fall-back position. For starters, how could slow, inefficient,
costly-to-operate and relatively unsafe at-grade rail get the job done in
Honolulu?
Honolulu’s unique
geographical layout and Oahu’s severe space restrictions require something
other than an off-the-shelf rail “solution.” At-grade rail simply can’t be
inserted into this environment and produce anything comparable to elevated
rail’s fast, frequent, reliable and safe service.
Job One: Safety
Job One: Safety
At-grade rail’s greatest
drawback, as we see it, is its safety record. Try inserting a ground-level rail
system into Honolulu’s crowded mix of vehicles and pedestrians and you’d
introduce the potential for accidents in dozens of locations throughout the
urban corridor, especially in downtown Honolulu.
Thanks to the
News.Google.com website, we keep track of at-grade rail accidents around the
mainland. On June 1, a Sound Transit at-grade train sliced through a truck carrying
cases of Mountain Dew soda in Seattle (photo at top).
There were no injuries, but
train passengers headed to the airport were inconvenienced (at right). That’s another consequence of at-grade rail
accidents – the loss of schedule reliability that commuters must have on their
daily trips through town. Elevated rail in Honolulu will deliver predictability
and reliability to passengers each and every time they ride.
So in addition to all the questions
Mr. Cayetano confronts about his proposed BRT scheme, the public needs answers
about his “and/or” intentions regarding at-grade rail transit.
As our dad was overly fond
of saying, “He poured it out. He has to clean it up.” A variation was, “You
poured it, you lick it.” (A ketchup bottle frequently was the heart of the matter.)
Happy Fathers Day to one and
all, especially our dads.
3 comments:
Great write up Doug! What can I, a rail loving common citizen of Honolulu do to ensure that Cayatano is NOT elected?
Looks like Governor Cayetano statement that he will be looking at options to rail means he will not be releasing anymore information concerning his alternative to rail. It of course means he actually does not have an alternative at this time. I am still confused as to why he released any information about a BRT alternative to rail when he has not yet decided on anything. Just asking..........
That's our conclusion, too, Roy -- "we'll look at" translates to "we have no plan yet." It's a good ask you ask :-)
Post a Comment