As this blog has insisted
for months, Yes2Rail is not a politics-oriented blog, and what’s written here isn’t
political. In that vein, you’ll have to read the Honolulu Star-Advertiser yourself to learn the paper’s pick in the 2012 mayoral
race.
But since Yes2Rail is an educational source of
information on the Honolulu rail project, we will repeat here some of the
reasons the Star-Advertiser’s
editorial says the anti-rail candidate doesn’t deserve to be elected.
By way of background,
Yes2Rail began asking what former Governor Ben Cayetano had in mind instead of
rail right after he announced his candidacy in January. Since he vowed he’d
kill rail, that was a legitimate issue to raise, and we raised it on January 20
one day after Mr. Cayetano’s announcement.
“…this is a one-issue
blog – Honolulu rail – and we’re sticking to our naïve notion that if a
candidate wants to kill the rail project, which has been planned and vetted for
at least six years at the local and national level with a clear set of goals
and designs down to the last girder and bolt, the candidate owes the electorate
something more than saying it costs too much and is ugly.”
For weeks, Yes2Rail seemed
to be the only entity asking for the candidate’s transportation plan. From this
former reporter’s perspective, the media’s failure to ask about it was
egregious.
So out of frustration,
Yes2Rail posted open letters to individual reporters at the Star-Advertiser,
Pacific Business News and Hawaii News Now urging them to gird their
loins and ask Mr. Cayetano for his detailed plan on what he’d implement instead
of rail to address Oahu’s nearly intolerable traffic congestion in the
east-west corridor.
Still they demurred, and a Star-Advertiser editorial finally asked – maybe also out of
frustration – on May 21st – “What exactly is Cayetano’s transit
plan?”
“…since it’s mayoral
front-runner (at the time) Ben
Cayetano who wants to unplug Honolulu’s hard-won advances toward a fixed-rail
solution,” the editorial said, “he
is the one who needs to deliver the goods. Professor Cayetano, take the podium
and enlighten us.”
(Yes2Rail observation: Since that was exactly what Yes2Rail had been urging since Day One, maybe a blog’s effectiveness should be
measured by more than its gross number of visits.)
But Mr. Cayetano never did
enlighten the community with a detailed plan to implement his bus rapid transit
idea – no specifics on construction costs, routes, frequencies, operating and
maintenance expenses, impact on congestion or BRT’s ability to accomplish
rail’s goals.
Today’s Editorial
Two months after the
newspaper’s “what the plan?” editorial, the Star-Advertiser is still not satisfied and writes today:
“At the outset of
Cayetano’s candidacy, we were eager to hear about his traffic initiative: a
profound, workable alternative perhaps? Disappointingly, no. There is no
revelatory plan, just a half-baked proposal hastily hatched from a 2003 bus
rapid transit study.
“Cayetano talks vaguely
about a dedicated bus way using the freeway’s Zipper Lane, a new ‘flyover’ ramp
approaching town, and perhaps taking a lane each of King and Beretania streets
for buses, which would still need to heed the stop-and-go traffic signals.
“Is that enough to get
motorists to leave their cars behind? Hardly. Also vague were the financial and
political means to make this BRT scheme happen.”
The editorial requires a
subscription to the newspaper if you want to read it online, and you’re on your
own in learning whom the paper endorses, because we’re not saying.
But we are saying this: Rail’s
goals, which have been vetted and approved for years, cannot be
accomplished by BRT or any other transportation scheme that’s been proposed as
an alternative to rail.
We've been highlighting those goals since early 2011, but if today is the first time
you read them, maybe you’ll now be able to judge for yourself why
only grade-separated rail transit can deliver fast, frequent, reliable and safe
transportation for Oahu residents between the ewa plain and town.
1 comment:
The StarAdvertiser editorial confirms my belief that Ben Cayetano's bus plan is a cruel hoax to fool the uninformed into believing he has a plan. Cayetano is running to stop the Honolulu rail system, period. If Cayetano manages to become Mayor and stop rail at least we can rest assured he won't be making traffic congestion even worse because his BRT system is a campaign hoax.
Post a Comment