Yes2Rail isn’t the only one
recycling material for a second bite at the apple (see yesterday's post). Look what Panos Prevedouros
is up to.
Dr. Prevedouros disputes
Honolulu’s “top” rank as having the nation’s worst traffic congestion. That was
the finding by INRIX, Inc., and it made news all over the country. You could
look it up.
But the University of
Hawaii’s resident highway expert says it just isn’t so. He posted yesterday at his FixOahu website (and links to an earlier piece he wrote for Honolulu Weekly) that despite INRIX’s
reputation and apparent credibility, he thinks Honolulu ranks only 50th.
And he can back it up! Of
course he can back it up. You can parse numbers every which way to “prove” what
you want to prove, and Dr. Prevedouros always parses them in favor of car
travel to the detriment of mass transit.
The Weekly column deserves a critical look by
Yes2Rail, which not only provides educational material about Honolulu’s future
elevated rail system but also schools our readers on holes in the anti-rail
rhetoric.
From the Top
Dr. Prevedouros’ very first
sentence attracts attention: “A recent finding that Honolulu is No. 1 in
traffic congestion in the US is being touted by some as proof that the city
needs heavy rail.”
Maybe some are touting "light metro" (not "heavy") in Honolulu
for that reason, but a true understanding of rail suggests another reason to
build grade-separated rail transit – to provide its patrons with complete
freedom from traffic congestion.
That’s the big payoff; users
will arrive at the nearest rail station by walking, using TheBus, being dropped
off or driving and parking, and from there they’ll be riding high above
traffic-clogged streets and highways.
After that opening, Dr. Prevedouros
sifts the data, criticizes INRIX’s techniques and comes up with a strange reason to oppose the Honolulu project: “…all the top 15 worst cities for
traffic congestion have rail! Rail systems have clearly failed to relieve
congestion from our most congested cities.”
He blames rail for not
relieving congestion! It’s like saying agriculture has failed to eliminate
world hunger, so we should avoid planting corn, soybeans and rice because
people are still hungry. In fact, rail’s function is to both take vehicles off the roads and avoid congestion.
Dr. Prevedouros’ reasoning
is completely illogical, yet that’s what the leading anti-rail campaigners want
you to believe – that because rail won’t “solve” congestion, we don’t need it. Even anti-railer-in-chief
Cliff Slater had to admit at a City Council hearing two years ago that “…rail
will have an effect on reducing traffic congestion from what it might be if we
did nothing at all….”
The ‘Simple’ Solution
“Honolulu’s traffic
congestion problem is simple,” Dr. Prevedouros writes, and concludes that
Honolulu has “too few lanes.” Our island environment has something to do with
that, of course, but the solution allegedly is simple: “Adding a few lanes will
go a long way toward relieving congestion in Honolulu.”
With all due respect to the
UH professor of civil and environmental engineering, that would not be simple in
space-short Honolulu, but even if it were, his solution violates “The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from US Cities,” a study by the
University of Toronto.
Yes2Rail linked to that study and another – “Generated Traffic and Induced Travel; Implications for Transportation Planning” – three months ago. In a nutshell, both studies
concluded that adding more lanes doesn’t “solve” congestion. It may relieve it
temporarily, but they fill up with vehicles as quickly as drivers perceive an
advantage to driving on them.
Once that happens, the new
lanes become as crowded as the old lanes, which is an inevitability in cities
like Honolulu with growing populations. So Dr. Prevedouros' simple solution of building new lanes and eating up
more space – space Honolulu doesn’t have to give – is the worst possible
response to congestion because it’s no solution at all.
As you anticipate the
Independence Day holiday, anticipate this: Honolulu’s response to traffic
gridlock is building a travel option that completely avoids that congestion –
elevated Honolulu rail.
3 comments:
Adding lanes. Hmm, that sounds familiar. Sounds like Dr. Prevedouros wants Oahu to look like Los Angeles. And what did adding lanes do for Los Angeles? It made traffic congestion even worse.
It sure seems like Professor Panos, AKA President of the Hawaii Highway Users Alliance Panos, is just a shill for freeway-dependent vested interests.
Prevedorous doesn't deserve "respect" for any of his statements about transportation, because he doesn't understand transportation beyond his narrow area of specialty, computer modeling of intersections.
Real transportation engineers, i.e., my colleagues, laugh at this over-educated tyro.
Post a Comment