Let’s get out of the daily
give-and-take on Honolulu rail and see what’s being said on the mainland about
transportation. It might just be educational.
From today’s San Jose Mercury News: “With his most
public cheerleading yet for California's bullet train, Gov. Jerry Brown on
Wednesday signed the $8 billion bill to kick off high-speed rail construction
and showed no sign he was worried about voters' increasing skepticism for the
rail line.
“Calling naysayers
‘NIMBYs,’ ‘fearful men,’ and ‘declinists,’ the governor celebrated a project
that he first signed a bill to study 30 years ago…. ’This legislation will
help put thousands of people in California back to work. By improving regional
transportation systems, we are investing in the future of our state and making
California a better place to live and work,’ Brown said.”
If this sounds familiar to
Honolulu ears, it should. Much of California high-speed rail commentary
is also said about the Honolulu project – from both sides of the issue.
Local critics led by
anti-railer-in-chief Cliff Slater have criticized the construction plan for
Honolulu rail, which will be built in phases. The earliest will connect Kapolei
with Waipahu and Aloha Stadium, and critics laugh off the ridership projections
between those points.
There’s a similar complaint
in California. Critics there ridicule the high-speed line’s initial
construction in the Central Valley between Madera and Bakersfield. “These
are not exactly major centers of business and culture,” sniffs one nay-sayer.
Transportation projects have
to start somewhere, of course, and Honolulu rail supporters counter the
criticism by noting that wherever the first phase is built, a maintenance and
storage facility must be located adjacent to it.
Work on Honolulu’s 43-acre
MSF began last year on a site just off Farrington Highway between Leeward
Community College and Waipahu High School. Carving out space that
large in urban Honolulu for the MSF would have been too costly with too much impact on the community,
which is why the project is proceeding from west to east.
Driverless Future?
Mr. Slater liked the piece
he read in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal so much he’s posted a link to it at
his anti-rail, pro-car website. An article headlined Paving the Way for Driverless Cars has a few nuggets
that are worth calling out because of their relevance to the Honolulu rail
project.
Author Clifford Winston
notes early in his article: “It is already possible to imagine a world in which
you could predict exactly how long it would take to drive in your car from one
point to another. No worries about rush hour, vacation congestion, bad drivers,
speed traps and accidents. You could also text while you drive with no safety
implications.”
Ironically, those are
exactly the same arguments Honolulu rail supporters make about the project. As
we’ve noted repeatedly here at Yes2Rail, grade-separated transit is
the only travel mode that allows users to accurately predict their time of
arrival before they even start their trip.
Deep into his piece, Mr.
Winston reveals what may really be driving the push for high-tech driverless
systems, a recurring desire of car advocates to create exclusive highway lanes that only the well-to-do could routinely
afford:
“The future also holds
the promise of new communications technologies that could let road authorities
use electronic tolls to charge motorists for their contribution to congestion,
based on actual traffic conditions, and thus encourage them to travel during
off-peak periods, use alternative routes, or switch to public transit. Driverless
cars would significantly help motorists respond to congestion tolls because
their technology can balance the cost of a toll with its travel time savings to
optimize motorists’ route choices.”
Anti-rail UH professor Panos
Prevedouros put it more succinctly a couple years ago: “Higher tolls are
necessary to discourage overloading.”
As we commented at the time,
“Vehicles presumably can travel relatively congestion-free on
(high-occupancy toll) lanes (when there are no accidents) only because most people decline to pay the high tolls. They’re left to sit in bumper-to-bumper traffic
on the other highways.”
The same would be true in
Mr. Winston’s high-tech car-dominant future society. It’s a vision that truly
hard to imagine happening on Oahu anytime before 2050 at the earliest, yet
congestion-free through-town travel will be achieved with the completion of the
Honolulu rail project’s 20-mile line by 2020.
Sooner is better than later in Honolulu, which already has the worst traffic congestion in the nation!
Sooner is better than later in Honolulu, which already has the worst traffic congestion in the nation!
War on Cars?
Finally, National Public
Radio’s “All Things Considered” program aired a segment yesterday that’s
recommended listening for Oahu residents as they ponder the never-ending debate
on the island’s future – with or without rail transit.
NPR’s ongoing “cities
project” reports on the state of urban America. ATC’s story Wednesday afternoon said its
next few series segments will examine cities’ relationship with cars. One city
examined yesterday is the nation’s capital, where the director of Washington’s
Office of Planning says there’s a shift under way from decades of car-focused
transportation planning.
“We’ve begun more than a
decade-long effort to rebalance our transportation system, in part because we
just don’t have the capacity in the city to accommodate everybody who wants to
be here to work or to live if everyone was always in an automobile for every
trip,” says Harriet Tregoning.
More transportation options
are good for not just commuters but city residents, too, she says: “People are
using these other transportation modes, and it’s making it possible for
restaurants and other businesses to open in all kinds of neighborhoods
throughout the city.”
The ATC piece is informative
listening, including how cities collaborated with the automobile industry to
create an urban landscape that’s been overwhelmed by cars and the road
infrastructure to support them for the past century.
That’s changing all over
America, and it’s changing in Honolulu, too. As Governor Brown said yesterday: "What is is all about is investing in the future. I know there are some fearful men – I call them declinists – who want to put their head in a hole and hope reality changes. I don't see it that way. This is a time to invest, to create thousands of jobs."
2 comments:
Only a drunken sailor, a complete idiot, a common sense challenged individual, a oil company executive, a automobile manufacturing executive, a libertarian or a highway advocate could possibly believe tens of thousands of driverless cars will solve the traffic congestion problem that tens of thousands of cars with driver create.
Drunken sailors are not that stupid.
Post a Comment